“Free speech but not reach” is discrimination.

Share

“Free speech but not reach” is discrimination.

Elon Musk was forced to visit Auschwitz with Ben “genocide” Shapiro after pressure from the ADL (AKA Apartheid Defence League).

Elon musk as with all other social media platforms is a prisoner to ad revenue – the social media revenue model is not conducive to free speech.

He tried to buck the trend but has succumbed.

His nonsensical idea of “free speech but not necessarily reach”, which is the approach he has implemented at X, is contradictory to his claims of being a free speech absolutist.

He claims he wants X to be the town square.

Well, imagine if people go to a town square and some have access to speak to all of the crowd, and others are only provided access to talk to half of the crowd – that’s not free speech, that’s discrimination.

But that is what his “free speech but not reach” really means in reality.

Next Up In Europe, Palestine and Israel, USA

Will you support our Work?

We want our content to reach as many people and in as many countries as possible. That is why we will not put our content behind an automatic paywall.

Any amount helps us to continue to shine the light on topics the mainstream media doesn’t cover. And helps us continue our unique analysis on Palestine and Israel, as well as bringing new perspectives to the fore.

We encourage any amount on a monthly recurring basis, as that allows us the stability we seek to maintain this endeavour until Palestine is free.

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay.
You can also contribute via

The Latest

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Each week, we hand curate a selection of the trending news and unique analysis.